IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ase/jgpgta/v9y2020i2p57-72id359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Globalisation and the funding sustainability of the OECD welfare state

Author

Listed:
  • Emilija Poposka

Abstract

Without any doubt, the relationship globalisation has with the welfare state size is a very controversial topic, especially after the 80ties, when globalisation took the high road and started drastically changing the world economies, policies and industries. Opening the economies, means opening them up to external pressures, generally and when it comes to wages, taxes and social expenditures. In many OECD countries, the welfare state is perceived as a main cause for the ineffectiveness of the economies, and as a disabler of the postulate of free market. But, these points of view, do not decrease the important role the welfare state actually has. The only thing they can actually change, in this constant fight for higher profits, is to affect the size the welfare states have, both on the sides of the revenues and expenditures. In this article we detect a negative relationship among globalisation and two types of tax revenues: tax on property and tax on payroll in the OECD for the observed period from 1980 to 2017. On the expenditure side, we detect a negative relationship among globalisation and the health expenditures. We as well find a present convergence of the welfare state sizes on the sample of the OECD countries. That is why, in the last part of this article, we overview the convergence in the European Union and the rest of the OECD countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Emilija Poposka, 2020. "Globalisation and the funding sustainability of the OECD welfare state," Journal Global Policy and Governance, Transition Academia Press, vol. 9(2), pages 57-72.
  • Handle: RePEc:ase:jgpgta:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:57-72:id:359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jgpg/article/view/359/232
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal Global Policy and Governance
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ase:jgpgta:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:57-72:id:359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giorgio Dominese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jgpg/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.