IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ase/jgpgta/v8y2019i2p43-70id305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is China’s Financial Sector Reform the Answer to Economic Globalisation?

Author

Listed:
  • Lucia Morales
  • Bernadette Andreosso-O’Callaghan

Abstract

The Chinese banking system is of interest to the analysts and scholars who seek to understand whether China’s financial reforms are susceptible to contribute to the needed conditions that support fast economic growth and development. Before the Global Financial Crisis, China’s economy was growing rapidly, and the country has now embarked upon a “new normal economic model.” This entails a greater development scope for China’s financial system. “The Big Four” Chinese commercial banks remain under the control and surveillance of the central government, a situation that raises significant criticisms among those who support banking deregulation, liberalisation and efficiency. However, China has shown that it was relatively prepared to manage two major crises – the Asian Economic and Financial Crisis, and the Global Financial Crisis – and that the close monitoring of its financial system should not be too easily dismissed. The main findings from this study highlight that the “Big Four” do not seem to be impacted upon by regional or global uncertainty, but that causal dynamics exist between Chinese top banks and regional market uncertainty, a phenomenon that needs to be carefully considered by policy makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucia Morales & Bernadette Andreosso-O’Callaghan, 2019. "Is China’s Financial Sector Reform the Answer to Economic Globalisation?," Journal Global Policy and Governance, Transition Academia Press, vol. 8(2), pages 43-70.
  • Handle: RePEc:ase:jgpgta:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:43-70:id:305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jgpg/article/view/305/203
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal Global Policy and Governance
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ase:jgpgta:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:43-70:id:305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giorgio Dominese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jgpg/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.