IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/jacarp/2019p78-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Assessment of Phosphorus Fertilization and Rhizobia Inoculation on Soybean Production in the Guinea Savanna Zone of Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Ebenezer Kofi

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University for Development Studies, Ghana)

  • Kugbe Xorse Joseph

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University for Development Studies, Ghana)

  • Adu-Gyamfi Raphael

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University for Development Studies, Ghana)

  • Odoom Asooming Daniel

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University for Development Studies, Ghana)

  • Laryea Obodia Kenneth

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University for Development Studies, Ghana)

  • Asodewine Peter

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University for Development Studies, Ghana)

Abstract

In the Guinea savannah zone of northern Ghana, the soils are reported to be declining for agricultural productivity. In these farming communities that depend on soybean production for their livelihoods, resource-poor farmers are not able to afford purchases of high cost inorganic phosphatic fertilizers to enhance the crop’s production. The need arises to identify efficient practices and strategies and research into alternative means of enhancing soybean production to improve food security. This Randomized Complete Block Design as an experimental tool was employed to carry out a research in the Guinea savanna zone of Ghana (Tolon District) to assess the agronomic and economic productivity of rhizobia inoculation use in soybean production. Treatments used for the experiment were sole soybean production, soybean + recommended phosphorus (P) fertilize rate, soybean + inoculums, and soybean + P + inoculum. A planting distance of 60*10cm was used during planting. Each treatment was replicated three times. Growth and yield data were collected on plant height, nodule number and dry weight, shoot dry weight, pods number and dry weight, grain yield, 100 seed weight and nodule effectiveness. The results revealed the existence of significant difference in grain yield between treatments (p = 0.011). Soybean + inoculation + P gave the highest yield of 3.6 t/ha followed by soybean + inoculation (3.17 t/ha), soybean + P (2.97 t/ha) and soybean only (2.6 t/ha) respectively. Significant difference was also observed for number of pods between treatments (p= 0.01), with soybean + inoculation + phosphorus recording the highest followed by soybean + inoculation, soybean + phosphorus and soybean-only treatment respectively. However, use of sole inoculation in soybean production was associated with the least production cost, high revenue generation and high benefit/cost ratio. As rhizobia inoculation of soybean produced higher yields and is comparatively cheaper than phosphorus application, inoculation is suggested for the resource poor farmer in Northern Ghana.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Ebenezer Kofi & Kugbe Xorse Joseph & Adu-Gyamfi Raphael & Odoom Asooming Daniel & Laryea Obodia Kenneth & Asodewine Peter, 2019. "Comparative Assessment of Phosphorus Fertilization and Rhizobia Inoculation on Soybean Production in the Guinea Savanna Zone of Ghana," Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(6), pages 78-86, 06-2019.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:jacarp:2019:p:78-86
    DOI: 10.32861/jac.56.78.86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/jac5(6)78-86.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/14/archive/06-2019/6/5
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32861/jac.56.78.86?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:jacarp:2019:p:78-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/index.php?ic=journal&journal=14&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.