IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/ellrar/2021p15-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring English Language Self-Efficacy: Psychometric Properties and Use

Author

Listed:
  • Do-Hong Kim

    (College of Education, Wayne State University, USA)

  • Chuang Wang

    (Faculty of Education, University of Macau, China)

  • Ting Sun

    (Cato College of Education, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA)

  • Lan Liu

    (Faculty of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Macau University of Science and Technology, China)

Abstract

This article provides an overview of existing instruments measuring self-efficacy for English language learning in both first and second language acquisition fields and their reliability and validity evidence. It also describes the development and use of the Questionnaire of English Language Self-Efficacy (QESE) scale, designed specifically for English language learners (ELLs), and presents an overview of the research findings from empirical studies related to its psychometric properties. A growing body of literature has begun to document encouraging evidence of ELL students’ self-efficacy belief measures and the utility of the QESE in particular. The information pertaining to the QESE is quite encouraging from measurement perspectives and fills the gap in the literature by providing a reliable and valid instrument to measure ELLs’ self-efficacy in various cultures. This paper concludes with evidence for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, structural, generalizability, and external aspects of the construct validity of the QESE. This paper contributes to the growing interest in these skills by reviewing the measures of self-efficacy in the field of second-language acquisition and the findings of empirical research on the development and use of a self-efficacy scale for ELLs.

Suggested Citation

  • Do-Hong Kim & Chuang Wang & Ting Sun & Lan Liu, 2021. "Measuring English Language Self-Efficacy: Psychometric Properties and Use," English Literature and Language Review, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 7(1), pages 15-23, 03-2021.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:ellrar:2021:p:15-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/ellr7(1)15-23.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/9/archive/03-2021/1/7
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:ellrar:2021:p:15-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/index.php?ic=journal&journal=9&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.