IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/bmerar/2016p74-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employee Potentiality vs. Job Responsibility: Employers’ View

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Abul Kashem

    (Assistant Professor, Department of Marketing, Faculty of Business Administration, Feni University, Bangladesh)

Abstract

Learning and expression of the fact-and-reality cannot take place at instance coincidentally. The variations embodied into both assessing and justification of traits and quality of an incumbent set up parameters based on some skills or factors. This study focused on the key factors having influence in selecting an employee for an organization. Due to varied nature of selection methods and variability, the factors were found disperse behavior in different dimensions. The researcher craved to identify the impact of scattered factors in selection of an employee and made some clusters through similarities and variability by Varimax Rotation Factor Analysis. From several factors, this study found that maximum preference toned with leadership skill under which leadership, oral communication, presentation skill, decision making capacity, capability to work in group, knowledge about corporate world, written communication, analytical ability, innovativeness, fellow feeling, and dedication to work were worth considerable. The study also encompassed other influential factors namely, team spirit, belongingness skills, analytical ability, change management skill, and human skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Abul Kashem, 2016. "Employee Potentiality vs. Job Responsibility: Employers’ View," Business, Management and Economics Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 2(4), pages 74-80, 04-2016.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:bmerar:2016:p:74-80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/bmer2(4)74-80.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=8&month=04-2016&issue=4&volume=2
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:bmerar:2016:p:74-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/index.php?ic=journal&journal=8&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.