IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/bmerar/2016p56-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deep Leadership® Coaching Effectiveness: A Case Study of a Science-Based Company

Author

Listed:
  • Pia-Maria Niemi

    (Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki, Finland)

  • Tommi Kinnunen

    (Adjunct Professor, National Defence University, Finland)

Abstract

Organizational coaching can be described as a learning process that aims to facilitate the participants’ leadership skills by providing them with new ways to view their work, as well as their actions within the work community. Previous studies focusing on the Deep Leadership® coaching process have found that the coaching program has immediate effects on the participating work communities. However, more studies on the effectiveness of the method are needed in order to enable an understanding of how the coaching method operates in different kinds of work communities. In this paper, we study the effectiveness of the Deep Leadership® coaching process  (DL, 2014) by analyzing the changes that have taken place within a science-based company during and after active between 2011 and 2012. In this study, we combine the statistical findings of 360-leadership profiles, coaching feedback data, and the organization’s climate survey data to evaluate the effectiveness of the Deep Leadership® coaching process. We will start by presenting the core aims and structure of the Deep Leadership® coaching process and the methods used to study the effectiveness of the program. Thereafter we will proceed to the analysis of this case study and discuss the findings in relation to previous studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Pia-Maria Niemi & Tommi Kinnunen, 2016. "Deep Leadership® Coaching Effectiveness: A Case Study of a Science-Based Company," Business, Management and Economics Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 2(3), pages 56-65, 03-2016.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:bmerar:2016:p:56-65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/bmer2(3)56-65.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=8&month=03-2016&issue=3&volume=2
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:bmerar:2016:p:56-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/index.php?ic=journal&journal=8&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.