IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/bmerar/2015p44-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting for Goodwill at Private versus Other Companies: Amortize, Impair, or Write Off

Author

Listed:
  • Dahli Gray

    (Graduate School Professor Keiser University 1900 W. Commercial Blvd. Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309, USA)

  • Monica Jorge

    (Staff Auditor with Cherry Bekaert LLP, Miami, FL 33183,USA)

Abstract

This article documents increased diversity in financial accounting practice. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) standard-setting process for the Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-18 is used as documentation. The FASB ASU 2014-18 was approved by a slim margin of four to three of the FASB members. This indicates continuing controversy around accounting for goodwill that relates to the public interest goal of similar accounting for similar transactions and events. This article analyzes the content within the 52 Comment Letters submitted in response to 18 questions asked by the Private Company Council (PCC) that lead to the promulgation of the FASB ASU 2014-18. Private companies are to include non-marketable intangibles in the account goodwill that non-private companies are to continue measure and report separate from goodwill. Plus private companies are allowed to either amortize or test for impairment in measuring and reporting goodwill. Non-private companies are to test for impairment. Non-private companies do not have the option of using amortization as part of the measurement and reporting process regarding goodwill. This diversity in measuring and reporting goodwill decreases progress toward the public interest goal of comparability of financial reports. Comparability is a significant quality thought to improve decision usefulness of information.

Suggested Citation

  • Dahli Gray & Monica Jorge, 2015. "Accounting for Goodwill at Private versus Other Companies: Amortize, Impair, or Write Off," Business, Management and Economics Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 1(4), pages 44-49, 08-2015.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:bmerar:2015:p:44-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/bmer1(4)44-49.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=8&month=08-2015&issue=4&volume=1
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:bmerar:2015:p:44-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/index.php?ic=journal&journal=8&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.