IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/ajoams/2021p16-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Critics and Contributions of Mathematical Philosophy in Hong Kong Secondary Education

Author

Listed:
  • Mr. Lam Kai Shun

    (Alumni of University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong)

Abstract

There are various schools of mathematical philosophy. However, none of them can be founded on mathematics alone. At the same time, there are two types of mathematical proof styles: Dialectic and algorithm mathematical proof. The relationship between proof and philosophy is to study philosophical problems with mathematical models. This type of proof is important to Hong Kong Secondary education. In addition, teachers should explain the connection between mathematics-based subjects, such as physics, so that lessons are more interesting rather than technical. Mathematics relates to nearly all other subjects, and as such has the role of a ‘public servant’ when it comes to serving them. One role of mathematics is to act as a ‘rational’ instrument for various subjects. This can be shown in many ancient human activities, such as Daoism and Liu Hiu, together with their symbolic representations. These examples are similar to Jewish culture; when discussing confidence, Abraham is often mentioned due to being the “Father of Confidence†. Thus, it may be said that mathematics is more than just a servant—it is also a cultural subject that has been recorded throughout history. To conclude, other than mathematical proof, Hong Kong teachers should also allow students to learn the cultural context behind various topics and subjects.

Suggested Citation

  • Mr. Lam Kai Shun, 2021. "The Critics and Contributions of Mathematical Philosophy in Hong Kong Secondary Education," Academic Journal of Applied Mathematical Sciences, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 7(1), pages 16-26, 01-2021.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:ajoams:2021:p:16-26
    DOI: 10.32861/ajams.71.16.26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/ajams7(1)16-26.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/17/archive/01-2021/1/7
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32861/ajams.71.16.26?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:ajoams:2021:p:16-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/index.php?ic=journal&journal=17&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.