IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/2001914584-590_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promoting breast and cervical cancer screening at the workplace: Results from the woman to woman study

Author

Listed:
  • Allen, J.D.
  • Stoddard, A.M.
  • Mays, J.
  • Sorensen, G.

Abstract

Objectives. This article reports findings from a peer-delivered intervention designed to increase use of breast and cervical cancer screening. Methods. Twenty-six worksites were randomly assigned to the intervention or comparison group. The 16-month intervention consisted of group discussions, outreach, and educational campaigns. Data were collected from a random sample of women employees stratified by age (baseline n=2943; final n=2747). Cross-sectional analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of the intervention on screening behaviors. Results. Relative to comparison worksites, the intervention group experienced greater increases in the percentage of women who reported a recent mammogram (7.2% vs 5.6%), clinical breast examination (5.8% vs 2.1%), and Papanicolaou (Pap) test (4.7% vs 1.9%). After worksite cluster and age strata were controlled for, the observed increase in Pap tests was significantly greater in the intervention group (odds ratio [OR]=1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.01, 1.62); however, differences in mammography screening rates (OR=1.14; 95% CI=0.90, 1.44) and clinical breast examination (OR=1.19; 95% CI=0.96, 1.49) were not statistically significant. Conclusions. Intervention activities produced a modest increase in cervical cancer screening, but they did not accelerate breast cancer screening rates above the observed secular trend.

Suggested Citation

  • Allen, J.D. & Stoddard, A.M. & Mays, J. & Sorensen, G., 2001. "Promoting breast and cervical cancer screening at the workplace: Results from the woman to woman study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(4), pages 584-590.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2001:91:4:584-590_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chattopadhyay, Sajal K. & Ebrahim, Shahul H. & Tao, Guoyu & McKenna, Matthew T., 2005. "Use of cervical cancer screening among insured women: the extent of missed opportunities," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 194-201, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2001:91:4:584-590_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.