IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/2000905751-756_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of a structured smoking cessation program, independent of exposure to existing interventions

Author

Listed:
  • Manfredi, C.
  • Crittenden, K.S.
  • Cho, Y.I.
  • Engler, J.
  • Warnecke, R.

Abstract

Objectives. This study assessed the effectiveness of a smoking cessation program for women in public health clinics, controlling for reported exposures to 4 common intervention components (provider advice, booklet, video segment, posters) among smokers in the control group. Methods. After a baseline control period, 10 pair-matched clinics were randomly assigned to study groups. A total of 1042 smokers in the combined baseline and control groups and 454 smokers in the intervention group completed a preintervention questionnaire and a postintervention telephone interview 5 to 8 weeks later. Eight smoking outcomes, including quitting, were analyzed for the effect of reported exposure to intervention components, experimental program, and clinic service. Results. Greater exposure to intervention components, being in the experimental program, and being seen in prenatal clinics independently improved smoking outcomes. Conclusions. The number of interventions reported by smokers in the control group ranged from none to 4 and varied across clinic services. The experimental program we tested produced better outcomes than the minimal smoking cessation interventions already existing in the control clinics, after we controlled for whether smokers were or were not exposed to these interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Manfredi, C. & Crittenden, K.S. & Cho, Y.I. & Engler, J. & Warnecke, R., 2000. "The effect of a structured smoking cessation program, independent of exposure to existing interventions," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 90(5), pages 751-756.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2000:90:5:751-756_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2000:90:5:751-756_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.