IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/2000905695-698_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The potential and limitations of data from population-based state cancer registries

Author

Listed:
  • Izquierdo, J.N.
  • Schoenbach, V.J.

Abstract

Cancer incidence varies markedly among states because of population heterogeneity regarding risk, genetic, and demographic factors. Population- based cancer registries are essential to monitoring cancer trends and control. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, through the National Program of Cancer registries, are helping state registries generate more and better data nationwide. The National Program of Cancer Registries has supported the enhancement of 36 registries and the creation of 13 new registries in 45 states, 3 territories, and the District of Columbia, providing national standards for completeness, timeless, and quality; financial support; and technical assistance. Users must be aware of diverse issues that influence collection and interpretation of cancer diagnoses, duplicate reports, reporting delays, misclassification of race/ethnicity, and pitfalls in estimation to these issues and intense use of the available data for cancer surveillance will enable maximum societal benefit from the emerging network of population-based state cancer registries.

Suggested Citation

  • Izquierdo, J.N. & Schoenbach, V.J., 2000. "The potential and limitations of data from population-based state cancer registries," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 90(5), pages 695-698.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2000:90:5:695-698_0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniele Nucci & Omar Enzo Santangelo & Sandro Provenzano & Cristina Fatigoni & Mariateresa Nardi & Pietro Ferrara & Vincenza Gianfredi, 2021. "Dietary Fiber Intake and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-20, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2000:90:5:695-698_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.