IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199989111637-1640_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Achieving a public health recommendation for preventing neural tube defects with folic acid

Author

Listed:
  • Werler, M.M.
  • Louik, C.
  • Mitchell, A.A.

Abstract

Objectives. This study examined 3 approaches to achieving the public health recommendation that all women of childbearing age ingest 0.40 mg of folic acid per day to reduce the occurrence of neural tube defects (NTDs). Methods. A total of 1136 mothers of infants with major malformations from the Boston and Philadelphia areas, whose pregnancies began from 1993 to 1995. were interviewed within 6 months of delivery about vitamin supplementation, dietary intakes, and other factors. Results. Seventy-one percent of the 1136 women in the study did not take folic acid - containing supplements daily before conception, but the proportion decreased over the years of the study. Women not taking supplements consumed an average of 0.25 mg of naturally occurring folates daily. On the basis of dietary intakes reported by women not taking folic acid supplements, a simulation of cereal grain fortification with folic acid at the level required by the US Food and Drug Administration showed that an average of only 0.13 mg of folic acid would be ingested daily. Conclusions. With consumption of folic acid only through dietary intake, sizeable portions of the childbearing population would receive less than the level of folic acid recommended for preventing NTDs. Even with food fortification, women of childbearing age should be advised to take folic acid-containing supplements on a daily basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Werler, M.M. & Louik, C. & Mitchell, A.A., 1999. "Achieving a public health recommendation for preventing neural tube defects with folic acid," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(11), pages 1637-1640.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:11:1637-1640_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:11:1637-1640_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.