IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/19988871047-1051_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupational skin diseases in Washington State, 1989 through 1993: Using workers' compensation data to identify cutaneous hazards

Author

Listed:
  • Kaufman, J.D.
  • Cohen, M.A.
  • Sama, S.R.
  • Shields, J.W.
  • Kalat, J.

Abstract

Objectives. This study sought to characterize occupational dermatoses and cutaneous hazards. Methods. Workers' compensation claims filed for skin disease in the Washington State Fund were analyzed for 1989 through 1993; incidence rates for industries and employers were calculated, and cutaneous hazards associated with the highest rates were identified. Results. A total of 7445 claims were filed for skin disorders, principally contact dermatitis; 675 (9.1%) involved more than 3 missed workdays. The rate of accepted skin disorder claims was 1.0 per 1000 full-time employee-years. The highest incidence rates (4.6 to 30.7 accepted claims per 1000 full-time employee- years) were in certain manufacturing industries (plastics related, concrete products, aircraft parts, sporting goods, and boat building), wholesale farm product raw materials, automotive glass replacement, and beauty shops. Seven of the 10 employers with the highest incidence rates (19.6 to 85.5 accepted claims per 1000 full-time employee-years) used fiber-reinforced plastics (composites) and exposed workers to epoxy and other resin systems associated with contact dermatitis. Conclusions. Workers' compensation data identify known and emerging workplace cutaneous hazards and show promise for targeting prevention efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaufman, J.D. & Cohen, M.A. & Sama, S.R. & Shields, J.W. & Kalat, J., 1998. "Occupational skin diseases in Washington State, 1989 through 1993: Using workers' compensation data to identify cutaneous hazards," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(7), pages 1047-1051.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1998:88:7:1047-1051_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1998:88:7:1047-1051_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.