IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1998885787-791_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Respiratory diphtheria in the United States, 1980 through 1995

Author

Listed:
  • Bisgard, K.M.
  • Hardy, I.R.B.
  • Popovic, T.
  • Strebel, P.M.
  • Wharton, M.
  • Chen, R.T.
  • Hadler, S.C.

Abstract

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiologic, laboratory, and clinical features of respiratory diphtheria cases reported in the United States during 1980 through 1995. Methods. Respiratory diphtheria cases reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were reviewed. Cases were defined as physician-diagnosed cases with signs and symptoms compatible with respiratory diphtheria, including the presence of a pseudomembrane without other apparent cause. Results. From 1980 through 1994, 41 respiratory diphtheria cases were reported, none were reported in 1995, and no secondary cases were identified. Nine (225) case patients were 4 years of age or younger, and 28 (68%) were 15 years of age or older. None of the case patients were put to date with diphtheria vaccination, 4 unvaccinated children died. Seventeen (43%) of 40 case patients had positive culture results. Conclusions. Available surveillance data suggest that respiratory diphtheria has become a rare disease in the United States. However, Importation and circulation of toxigenic strains continue to present a threat and require achieving and maintaining high coverage with diphtheria toxoid- containing vaccines in both children and adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Bisgard, K.M. & Hardy, I.R.B. & Popovic, T. & Strebel, P.M. & Wharton, M. & Chen, R.T. & Hadler, S.C., 1998. "Respiratory diphtheria in the United States, 1980 through 1995," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(5), pages 787-791.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1998:88:5:787-791_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1998:88:5:787-791_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.