IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1998883357-363_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State funding of comprehensive primary medical care service programs for medically underserved populations

Author

Listed:
  • Rosenbaum, S.
  • Hawkins Jr., D.R.
  • Rosenbaum, E.
  • Blake, S.

Abstract

Objectives. This study examined the availability of state funding for comprehensive primary care programs and the need for primary care subsidies for medically underserved communities. Methods. A brief questionnaire was used to ask health agencies in all 50 states whether their state funded a program that met our definition of comprehensive primary medical care practice programs. An in-depth written survey instrument was then administered to the states with programs. Results. Almost half of all states provide some funds for the development and/or operation of comprehensive primary medical care practices. Expenditures in most states were found to be relatively modest in comparison with both federal funding and the total level of unmet need for primary care. States that subsidize primary care practices tend to follow the model established under the federal health centers program. Conclusions. The findings suggest the continued viability of the health center model of care, as well as the presence of some state support for such a program. However, in light of limited state resources for the development and operation of comprehensive practices, a continued and significant federal effort is imperative.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosenbaum, S. & Hawkins Jr., D.R. & Rosenbaum, E. & Blake, S., 1998. "State funding of comprehensive primary medical care service programs for medically underserved populations," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(3), pages 357-363.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1998:88:3:357-363_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1998:88:3:357-363_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.