IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1976669847-853_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communication, compliance, and concordance between physicians and patients with prescribed medications

Author

Listed:
  • Hulka, B.S.
  • Cassel, J.C.
  • Kupper, L.L.
  • Burdette, J.A.

Abstract

Forty six practicing physicians and 357 patients with diabetes mellitus or congestive heart failure were the subjects for this study, which focuses on the impact of medication regimen and doctor patient communication in affecting patient medication taking behavior and physician awareness of these behaviors. Four types of medication errors were defined: omissions, commissions, scheduling misconceptions and scheduling non compliance. The average error rates were 19%, 19%, 17% and 3%, respectively. The combined average error was 58%; scheduling non compliance on the part of the patient was a minor component. Specific aspects of the medication regimen were associated with increased errors: the more drugs involved between the doctor patient pair, the greater the errors of omission and commission; and the greater the complexity of the scheduling, the greater the errors of commission and scheduling misconceptions. If the patient did not know the function of all his drugs, errors of commission and scheduling misconception increased. Neither characteristics of patients nor the severity of disease were influential in determining the extent of medication errors. For patients with congestive heart failure, good communication of instructions and information from physician to patient was associated with low levels of all types of errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Hulka, B.S. & Cassel, J.C. & Kupper, L.L. & Burdette, J.A., 1976. "Communication, compliance, and concordance between physicians and patients with prescribed medications," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 66(9), pages 847-853.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1976:66:9:847-853_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1976:66:9:847-853_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.