IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2017.304105_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating public health interventions: 7. Let the subject matter choose the effect measure: Ratio, difference, or something else entirely

Author

Listed:
  • Spiegelman, D.
  • Khudyakov, P.
  • Wang, M.
  • Vanderweele, T.J.

Abstract

We define measures of effect used in public health evaluations, which include the risk difference and the risk ratio, the population-attributable risk, years of life lost or gained, disability-adjusted life years, quality-adjusted life years, and the incremental costeffectiveness ratio. Except for the risk ratio, all of these are absolute effect measures. For constructing externally generalizable absolute measures of effect when there is superior fit of the multiplicative model, we suggest using the multiplicative model to estimate relative risks, which will often be obtained in simple linear form with no interactions, and then converting these to the desired absolute measure. The externally generalizable absolute measure of effect can be obtained by suitably standardizing to the risk factor distribution of the population to which the results are to be generalized. External generalizability will often be compromised when absolute measures are computed from study populations with risk factor distributions different from those of the population to whom the results are to be generalized, even when these risk factors are not confounders of the intervention effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Spiegelman, D. & Khudyakov, P. & Wang, M. & Vanderweele, T.J., 2018. "Evaluating public health interventions: 7. Let the subject matter choose the effect measure: Ratio, difference, or something else entirely," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 108(1), pages 73-76.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.304105_3
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.304105_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.