IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2017.303824_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crowdsourced health data: Comparability to a US national survey, 2013-2015

Author

Listed:
  • Yank, V.
  • Agarwal, S.
  • Loftus, P.
  • Asch, S.
  • Rehkopf, D.

Abstract

Objectives. To determine the generalizability of crowdsourced, electronic health data from self-selected individuals using a national survey as a reference. Methods. Using the world's largest crowdsourcing platform in 2015, we collected data on characteristics known to influence cardiovascular disease risk and identified comparable data from the 2013 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We used age-stratified logistic regression models to identify differences among groups. Results. Crowdsourced respondents were younger, more likely to be non-Hispanic and White, and had higher educational attainment. Those aged 40 to 59 years were similar to US adults in the rates of smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Those aged 18 to 39 years were less similar, whereas those aged 60 to 75 years were underrepresented among crowdsourced respondents. Conclusions. Crowdsourced health data might be most generalizable to adults aged 40 to 59 years, but studies of younger or older populations, racial and ethnic minorities, or those with lower educational attainment should approach crowdsourced data with caution. PublicHealth Implications. Policymakers, the national PrecisionMedicine Initiative, andothers planning to use crowdsourced data should take explicit steps to define and address anticipated underrepresentation by important population subgroups.

Suggested Citation

  • Yank, V. & Agarwal, S. & Loftus, P. & Asch, S. & Rehkopf, D., 2017. "Crowdsourced health data: Comparability to a US national survey, 2013-2015," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(8), pages 1283-1289.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303824_2
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303824
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303824?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303824_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.