IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2013.301514_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mandatory influenza vaccination for health care workers as the new standard of care: A matter of patient safety and nonmaleficent practice

Author

Listed:
  • Cortes-Penfield, N.

Abstract

A growing body of literature defends the efficacy of seasonal influenza vaccination for health care workers in reducing the mortality of hospitalized patients. I review the evidence concerning influenza vaccination, concluding that universal vaccination of health care workers against influenza should be considered standard patient care and that nonvaccination represents maleficent care. I further argue that the ethical responsibility to ensure universal vaccination of staff against seasonal influenza lies not only with individual health care providers but with each individual health care institution.

Suggested Citation

  • Cortes-Penfield, N., 2014. "Mandatory influenza vaccination for health care workers as the new standard of care: A matter of patient safety and nonmaleficent practice," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(11), pages 2060-2065.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2013.301514_0
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301514
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301514?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wim Leo Celina Van Hooste & Micheline Bekaert, 2019. "To Be or Not to Be Vaccinated? The Ethical Aspects of Influenza Vaccination among Healthcare Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-10, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2013.301514_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.