IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apb/jahsss/2019p44-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A preliminary study on the cause of conflicts in multidisciplinary collaboration

Author

Listed:
  • Shou-Te Pan

    (Digital Media Design, Yunlin, Taiwan)

  • Li-Shu Lu

    (Digital Media Design, Yunlin, Taiwan)

Abstract

With the globalization of business models and competition, traditional individual work mode is gradually replaced by multidisciplinary collaboration as more and more work needs to integrate different specialized knowledge. Accordingly, the process of interdisciplinary talent training has also become one of the hot topics in education. Therefore, this study tried to explore the causes of conflicts in multidisciplinary team collaboration. In the study, we collected relevant researches on multidisciplinary teams over the ten years and selected five papers involving the research on the cooperation process of the same, among which we found that each team involved at least two of three fields, namely engineering, management and design. This paper sorted out the problems arising from multidisciplinary collaboration through content analysis and grouped them through KJ method (also called affinity diagram method) in collaboration with researchers with exact experience, for further analysis and induction. According to the study, problems encountered by multidisciplinary teams can be classified into nine categories: professional background, team composition, task allocation, role positioning, relationship, communication, attitude, efficiency and external factors. To be specifically, (1) professional background: a problem related to team member’s majors, for different majors have different languages, with rare knowledge in other fields and inconsistent cognitions; (2) team composition: a problem concerned with the structure of the organization, the imbalance among specialties for example; (3) job assignment: a problem regarding the allocation of different tasks, clear or not; (4) role positioning: a problem related to the positioning of members within the team, like absence of leader for specific work; (5) relationship: a problem regarding the interactions between team members, such as being unacquainted, holding different opinions, etc.; (6) communication: about the exchange of knowledge or intelligence, such as poor communication, differences in opinions and ideas, etc.; (7) attitude: a problem in personal style, for example, uncompromising insistence on one’s own professional acknowledge; (8) efficiency: a problem related to the completion of tasks, stagnation for failing to find answers to specific concerns for instance; (9) external factors: problems that are difficult for team members to control, such as lack of funds and time, geographical inconvenience, dissatisfaction of the clients, etc. This study is expected to clarify the problems arising in the process of multidisciplinary team collaboration, providing references for subsequent researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Shou-Te Pan & Li-Shu Lu, 2019. "A preliminary study on the cause of conflicts in multidisciplinary collaboration," Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, Dr. Yi-Hsing Hsieh, vol. 5(1), pages 44-53.
  • Handle: RePEc:apb:jahsss:2019:p:44-53
    DOI: 10.20474/jahss-5.1.5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/platform/Articles/full-jahss5.1.5.php
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/gip_content/paper/jahss-5.1.5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20474/jahss-5.1.5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apb:jahsss:2019:p:44-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Yi-Hsing Hsieh (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://tafpublications.com/platform/published_papers/12 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.