IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apb/jahsss/2018p161-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Muslim subjects of the kingdom of Georgia in the 12th-early 13th century

Author

Listed:
  • Gotcha Djaparidze

    (Faculty of Humanities, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia)

  • Nani Gelovani

    (Faculty of Humanities, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia)

Abstract

In the first of the 12th century, David IV the Builder, King of Georgia (1089-1125) completed the political unification of the country. Georgia, having thrown away the domination of Turk-Saljuq rule, turned into a powerful feudal monarchy. His seccessors Demetre I (1125-1156), Giorgi I (1156-11840), Tamar (1184-1210) and Giorgi Lasha (1210-1223) continued David the Builder’s political course directed at uniting the Transcaucasian countries under Georgia’s leadership. Georgia’s expansion resulted not only in the redeeming of Georgian lands proper but also in incorporation of non-Georgian regions (part of Shirvan, North Armenia) together with their non-Georgian and non-Orthodox Christian Population: Muslims, Jews and Gregorians/Monophyte Armenians. This raised the problem of the status of the followers of other religions, especially of Muslims, who for the first time came under Georgian rule. The aim of the article is a) to study the question of peaceful coexistence between Christian Georgia and the Islamic World; b) to discuss and explore the policy of tolerance of other religions pursued by Georgian King David IV the Builder and his successors in their Muslim subjects. It is suggested that the status of the Muslim population in the Christian Kingdom of Georgia resembled that of the dhimmis (or members of the “protected” communities) in the Islamic states, although the Muslims living in the Kingdom of Georgia enjoyed more rights than the dhimmis in Islamic countries, legally and socially they were not equal with Christians. The methodological foundation of the research is the method of historism, scholarly objectivity and systematicity which will enable us to explore deeply the issues of the research. Statistical, historical-comparative and chronological methods will be the basis of the analysis of the historical data and adequate conclusions will be reached. These methodologies made it possible for us to discuss the politics of religious tolerance from the analytic point of view on the bases of that data and sources belonging to various types (narrative, epigraphic, documental) and various languages (Georgian, Armenian, Arabic, Persian and Turkish). The 12th-13th century Georgian literature and historical sources, expressing negative feelings towards Islam, keep silent about policy of Georgian kings towards their subjected Muslim population. But the works of Arab and Persian authors, dating from the same period, contain information concerning this fact. One part of these sources will be studied from the standpoint of the history of Georgia for the first time.

Suggested Citation

  • Gotcha Djaparidze & Nani Gelovani, 2018. "The Muslim subjects of the kingdom of Georgia in the 12th-early 13th century," Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, Dr. Yi-Hsing Hsieh, vol. 4(4), pages 161-166.
  • Handle: RePEc:apb:jahsss:2018:p:161-166
    DOI: 10.20474/jahss-4.4.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/platform/Articles/full-jahss4.4.1.php
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/gip_content/paper/Jahss-4.4.1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20474/jahss-4.4.1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apb:jahsss:2018:p:161-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Yi-Hsing Hsieh (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://tafpublications.com/platform/published_papers/12 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.