IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/jeelre/v9y2022i4p269-277id4253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Differentiated Instruction on the Mathematical Thinking Processes of Gifted and Talented Students

Author

Listed:
  • Mohd Hasrul Kamarulzaman
  • Mohd Fadzil Kamarudin
  • Mohd Saifun Aznin Mohd Sharif
  • Muhammad Zaim Esrati
  • Muhammad Zaim Esrati
  • Rorlinda Yusof

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine if differentiated instruction benefits the mathematical thinking process of gifted and talented students in Malaysia. Differentiated instruction is a student-centered technique in which instructors act as facilitators. It is doubtful, however, if differentiated instruction has a beneficial effect on the overall process of mathematical thinking. A disciplined approach to learning mathematics is deemed essential. In this study, a questionnaire was designed to assess students' motivation towards learning using differentiated instruction in mathematics, and a mathematics test was devised to assess students' mathematical thinking process. The study included 400 students who were identified as gifted and talented students; the data were analyzed using the SPSS software. The results suggest that statistically differentiated instruction has a significant effect on gifted and talented students' mathematical thinking processes. However, additional research is needed to discover which activities directly impact students' mathematical thinking processes positively and which should be avoided.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohd Hasrul Kamarulzaman & Mohd Fadzil Kamarudin & Mohd Saifun Aznin Mohd Sharif & Muhammad Zaim Esrati & Muhammad Zaim Esrati & Rorlinda Yusof, 2022. "Impact of Differentiated Instruction on the Mathematical Thinking Processes of Gifted and Talented Students," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 9(4), pages 269-277.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:9:y:2022:i:4:p:269-277:id:4253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/4253/2452
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:9:y:2022:i:4:p:269-277:id:4253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.