IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/jeelre/v8y2021i3p360-366id3311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Jordanian EFL Students’ Types of Intelligence in Learning English

Author

Listed:
  • Sana’ Ababneh

Abstract

The present study investigated the types of intelligence BAU students prefer to use in learning English. This study used a quantitative method for collecting data via a questionnaire. The subjects of the study were 138 Jordanian students at Al-Huson University College, Al-Balqa Applied University. The results revealed that logical-mathematical and linguistic intelligence was the most dominant type of intelligence among the students. However, neither their gender nor their academic degree program had a significant effect on their learning type of intelligence. Nevertheless, the data showed substantial differences among the students in the interpersonal type of intelligence in favor of male students, while these differences were in favor of the females in the intrapersonal type. There were significant differences in the logical-mathematical type of intelligence between the bachelor’s degree students and their diploma colleagues in favor of the bachelor ones. The researcher attempts to shed light on Jordanian EFL students’ types of intelligence and their preferred types when learning English, in hopes that it becomes possible for teachers to recognize the types according to their students’ profiles and help match them with those present or assess whether they need to develop strategies to cover the full spectrum of the types found in MI Theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Sana’ Ababneh, 2021. "Jordanian EFL Students’ Types of Intelligence in Learning English," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 8(3), pages 360-366.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:8:y:2021:i:3:p:360-366:id:3311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/3311/2154
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/3311/2209
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:8:y:2021:i:3:p:360-366:id:3311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.