IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/jeelre/v6y2019i3p142-148id956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Multicultural Competence of Counsellors in Public Universities in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Ebenezer Kobina Mensah

Abstract

A person’s cognition defines the cultural mindset, religious beliefs and way of life. Culture affords its adherents with a theoretical basis for the understanding of sickness and emotive misery. This study, therefore, aimed at assessing multicultural competence of counsellors in the public universities in Ghana. The study adopted the descriptive survey design and mainly questionnaire (Multicultural Competence Questionnaire, [MCQ]) to obtain data. A sample of 45 counsellors was used for the study comprising 25 male counsellors and 20 female counsellors. The study used descriptive statistical tools (means and standard deviations) to analyse data obtained. The study revealed that counsellors sampled perceived their cultural competency to be low as measured on all sections (Knowledge, Skills and Awareness). This low cultural competence is portrayed by looking at the overall means on the sections as well as the overall mean (2.34) of the MCQ whose mean scores obtained were lower than the standard benchmark (2.50). From the results obtained, it is recommended among others that counsellors should capitalise on the low multicultural counselling competence to attend multicultural awareness training programme about Ghanaian cultural beliefs and ethnic diversity to increase their competence. Also, multicultural counselling should be infused in counselling programmes and training in Ghana.

Suggested Citation

  • Ebenezer Kobina Mensah, 2019. "Assessing Multicultural Competence of Counsellors in Public Universities in Ghana," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 6(3), pages 142-148.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:6:y:2019:i:3:p:142-148:id:956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/956/1140
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:6:y:2019:i:3:p:142-148:id:956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.