IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/jeelre/v3y2016i3p78-86id87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examinations Wash Back Effects: Challenges to the Criterion Referenced Assessment Model

Author

Listed:
  • Mogapi, M

Abstract

Examinations play a central role in the educational system due to the fact that information generated from examinations is used for a variety of purposes. Critical decisions such as selection, placement and determining the instructional effectives of a programme of study all depend on data generated from examinations. Numerous research studies have shown that examinations have an influence on the learning and teaching process and that such influence could be either positive or negative. It is imperative that washback effect is evaluated to determine its impact on the quality of learning and teaching that goes on in the schools. This paper presents evidence that point towards presence of examination washback effect on the teaching process as a result of the format and content of the Primary School Leaving Examinations in Botswana. A questionnaire containing quantitative and qualitative items was used to capture opinions of teachers relating to the extent to which final examinations influences topic select , content coverage, teaching methods, and classroom activities. Generally, opinions presented by the teachers point towards presence of a negative washback effect. This apparent negative washback effect on the curriculum presents a challenge to a successful implementation of criterion reference testing system in Botswana.

Suggested Citation

  • Mogapi, M, 2016. "Examinations Wash Back Effects: Challenges to the Criterion Referenced Assessment Model," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 3(3), pages 78-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:3:y:2016:i:3:p:78-86:id:87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/87/75
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:3:y:2016:i:3:p:78-86:id:87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.