IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/jeelre/v10y2023i3p389-396id4726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring pre-service visual art teachers’ competitiveness through porter’s five forces model

Author

Listed:
  • Nurgul Koshkinbayeva
  • Zaure Shagataeva
  • Almagul Utepova
  • Kunsulu Taukebayeva
  • Sulugul Kurmantayeva

Abstract

The primary objective of this cross-sectional study was to explore the degree to which 117 pre-service visual art teachers’ competitiveness within the education field. A self-reported competitiveness scale (six items distributed between three factors) was designed and validated by the authors based on the focal points of Michael Porter’s Five Forces framework. Additionally, the respondents’ digital competence was assessed as an auxiliary criterion of educator attractiveness in the art education domain. Both competitiveness and digital skills measurements yielded mediocre scores. Regression analysis showed that respondents’ competitiveness perceptions were predicted neither by digital skills level nor by socio-demographic characteristics such as age, gender, rural or urban background, marital status or whether the student was a graduate or undergraduate. The present study highlights the need for understanding of how visual art majors perceive the sector and evaluate competitiveness among visual art students which itself indicates its sizable contribution to educational research. Other researchers can employ the competitiveness questionnaire introduced to gain deeper insights into the topic or related subjects.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurgul Koshkinbayeva & Zaure Shagataeva & Almagul Utepova & Kunsulu Taukebayeva & Sulugul Kurmantayeva, 2023. "Exploring pre-service visual art teachers’ competitiveness through porter’s five forces model," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 10(3), pages 389-396.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:10:y:2023:i:3:p:389-396:id:4726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/4726/2630
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:10:y:2023:i:3:p:389-396:id:4726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.