IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/jeelre/v10y2023i3p371-379id4717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

English teachers’ perception and attitudes of scaffolding method in teaching academic writing: An exploratory study at universities in Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Ban Mai
  • Ta Huu Hien
  • Nguyen Le Tuong Phuong

Abstract

The primary aim of this research is to investigate the impact of utilizing the scaffolding method on teaching academic writing in the context of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) at universities in Vietnam. This mixed-method study examined the attitudes and perceptions of 88 EFL educators from diverse backgrounds and degree levels who were randomly selected for the research. Methodologically, data were gathered and analyzed using the appropriate methods for each instrument, including a questionnaire and focus group discussion (FGD). Theoretically, the study is a medley of relevant theories and approaches such as Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory of Learning, the Scaffolding theory, and the ‘High challenge - High support’ pedagogy. The results of this study suggest that participants used scaffolding to some extent and had strongly positive attitudes and perceptions regarding its practical aspects; however, the findings also revealed that the surveyed lecturers are deficient in the necessary knowledge and skills. In addition, the study's findings imply that EFL teachers need training on how to properly use scaffolding as a pedagogical strategy to facilitate teaching academic writing to EFL students.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Ban Mai & Ta Huu Hien & Nguyen Le Tuong Phuong, 2023. "English teachers’ perception and attitudes of scaffolding method in teaching academic writing: An exploratory study at universities in Vietnam," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 10(3), pages 371-379.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:10:y:2023:i:3:p:371-379:id:4717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/4717/2628
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:10:y:2023:i:3:p:371-379:id:4717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.