IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/asjoet/v8y2022i2p51-59id3963.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship between Argumentation Skills and Cognitive Flexibility of Pre-Service Science Teachers

Author

Listed:
  • Ozlem Cankaya
  • Nilay Aydogan

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the relationship between pre-service science teachers' argumentation skills and cognitive flexibility levels. Within the scope of the study, an argumentation-based science laboratory application was applied to first year science teaching students for 4 weeks. The arguments were assessed by eight faculty members and doctoral students. The Argumentation Assessment Rubric (Choi, 2008) was used to assess the quality of the written arguments. The quality of the arguments and descriptions used by the students in the reports were evaluated as total writing scores. The “Cognitive Flexibility Inventory” developed by Dennis and Vander Wal (2010) was employed to assess the cognitive flexibility levels of pre-service teachers. Simple Correlation analysis and Simple Linear Regression analysis methods were used to determine the relationship between the sub-dimensions of cognitive flexibility inventory and argumentation skills of pre-service science teachers and the effect of cognitive flexibility levels on argumentation skills. The results showed that there was a significant relationship between pre-service teachers’ cognitive flexibility levels and argumentation skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Ozlem Cankaya & Nilay Aydogan, 2022. "The Relationship between Argumentation Skills and Cognitive Flexibility of Pre-Service Science Teachers," Asian Journal of Education and Training, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 8(2), pages 51-59.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:asjoet:v:8:y:2022:i:2:p:51-59:id:3963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/EDU/article/view/3963/2345
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:asjoet:v:8:y:2022:i:2:p:51-59:id:3963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/EDU/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.