IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/asjoet/v6y2020i2p246-255id1525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Investigation of Multiple Intelligence Modalities of University Students Receiving Sports Education

Author

Listed:
  • Mevlüt Yildiz
  • Yavuz Öntürk
  • Engin Efek

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the dominant intelligence modality of university students who receive sports education and to examine intelligence modality in terms of various variables. The survey model was chosen for the model of the study. 251 students voluntarily participated in the study. A 6-question Personal Information Form was used by the researchers to determine the demographic characteristics of the participants, and the Multiple Intelligence Scale adapted in Turkish by Babacan and Dilci (2012) was used to determine the multiple intelligence areas. According to the findings, the intelligence modality in which the participants were the most dominant was physical intelligence, and the intelligence modality in which they were the most distant was the verbal intelligence. While multiple intelligence areas differed according to the gender, class, age and sports time of the participants, there was no significant difference in multiple intelligence areas according to department and branch variables. In addition, female participants, 3rd grade students and those who have more time to do sports are more dominant in every intelligence field. As a result, it was concluded that the most dominant intelligence field is physical intelligence and that women are more dominant in multiple intelligence domains than men. It was once again revealed that the duration of sports is an important factor in the development of multiple intelligence areas of individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Mevlüt Yildiz & Yavuz Öntürk & Engin Efek, 2020. "The Investigation of Multiple Intelligence Modalities of University Students Receiving Sports Education," Asian Journal of Education and Training, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 6(2), pages 246-255.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:asjoet:v:6:y:2020:i:2:p:246-255:id:1525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/EDU/article/view/1525/1473
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/EDU/article/view/1525/2525
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:asjoet:v:6:y:2020:i:2:p:246-255:id:1525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/EDU/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.