IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/asjoet/v5y2019i3p429-439id1020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High School Mathematics’ Teachers’ Knowledge, Opinions, and Preferences about Types of Problems (An Example from Turkey)

Author

Listed:
  • Seval Deniz KILIÇ

Abstract

Problem solving is the building block of mathematics. Different approaches have been exhibited throughout the history to solve the problems that are as old as the history of humanity. As a result of developments in mathematics education, the problems are divided into different types according to the solution methods. Determining the types of these problems and their solution methods is a very important gain for students studying mathematics education. Thus, the approaches of teachers to this subject, as a guide, will lead the way for their students. The purpose of this study is to determine mathematics teachers’ knowledge, opinions, and preferences about the types of problems. The participants of the study were chosen among the mathematics teachers working in high schools located in a city in Turkey. The data sources of the study which adopted qualitative research methods are the interviews with the teachers, written exam questions, and lesson observations. For the data analysis, thematic content analysis and frequency and percentages were used. Considering the results obtained, the teachers do not recognize the non-routine problems and they do not use them in their exams and lessons. However, they find such problems meaningful and they want to use them in their courses if the necessary conditions are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Seval Deniz KILIÇ, 2019. "High School Mathematics’ Teachers’ Knowledge, Opinions, and Preferences about Types of Problems (An Example from Turkey)," Asian Journal of Education and Training, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 5(3), pages 429-439.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:asjoet:v:5:y:2019:i:3:p:429-439:id:1020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/EDU/article/view/1020/1159
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:asjoet:v:5:y:2019:i:3:p:429-439:id:1020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/EDU/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.