IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/ajssms/v8y2021i1p1-6id2690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Joint Family or Nuclear Family: The Youth’s Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Afifa Khalid
  • Aqsa Painda Khan
  • Sadia Mangan
  • Sateesh Kumar
  • Shivam Golani
  • Kashaf Aqeel Zaidi

Abstract

To identify the youth’s perspective regarding joint and nuclear family systems and the factors contributing to it. A cross-sectional study conducted in 2020 in Karachi. The target population was between 18 and 45 years of age with a sample size of 523. An online questionnaire was circulated through convenience sampling technique. Data was imported and analyzed in SPSS Version 20. The sample population included 523 participants with n=441(84.3%) between 18-24 years and a female predominance n=333(63.7%). N= 454 (86.8%) participants were single. More than half n=298(57%) live in a nuclear family system, whereas, 194(37.1%) live in a joint family system. Majority n=321 (61.3%) believed there is greater expectation to agree with the opinion of the head of the family in a joint family system and lesser freedom. Mixed views were reflected regarding an increased emotional and financial stability in a joint family system with 42.8% and 59.5%, respectively. The global drift from joint family systems towards nuclear family systems was also evident in our study. The younger generation prefers nuclear family systems as they feel it respects their privacy and freedom. Moreover, it also dissociates them from any family disputes and undue stress associated with it.

Suggested Citation

  • Afifa Khalid & Aqsa Painda Khan & Sadia Mangan & Sateesh Kumar & Shivam Golani & Kashaf Aqeel Zaidi, 2021. "Joint Family or Nuclear Family: The Youth’s Perspective," Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 8(1), pages 1-6.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:ajssms:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:1-6:id:2690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/AJSSMS/article/view/2690/2012
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:ajssms:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:1-6:id:2690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/AJSSMS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.