IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/ajeaer/v3y2016i1p103-112id217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Islamic Versus Conventional Banking: An Insight into the Malaysian Dual Banking System

Author

Listed:
  • Khurshid Ali
  • Zeeshan Khan
  • Abdullah Saleh

Abstract

This research aims at examining to match the performance of both Malaysian Islamic and conventional banking through profitability, efficiency, solvency and liquidity and risk management ratios using independent t-test and discriminant regression models. Fifteen financial ratios are applied to examine the competitiveness of the both industries created on the financial data of ten Malaysian banks, five from both industries, over the period of six financial years (2009-2015). According to the independent t-test descriptive statistics, the result finds that conventional banks perform well than Islamic banks in the context profitability and efficacy ratios. Nevertheless, in terms of solvency and liquidity & risk management ratios Islamic banks outperform conventional banks operating in Malaysia. Further, it has been revealed by the disciriminant analysis that in general conventional banks execute well than Islamic banks operating in Malaysia when it comes to the profitability, solvency, efficiency and liquidity & risk management ratios.

Suggested Citation

  • Khurshid Ali & Zeeshan Khan & Abdullah Saleh, 2016. "Islamic Versus Conventional Banking: An Insight into the Malaysian Dual Banking System," Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 3(1), pages 103-112.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:ajeaer:v:3:y:2016:i:1:p:103-112:id:217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/AJEER/article/view/217/194
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:ajeaer:v:3:y:2016:i:1:p:103-112:id:217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/AJEER/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.