IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/anr/reseco/v13y2021p267-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Benefit-Cost Analysis: A Comparative Analysis Between the United States and the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph E. Aldy

    (Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA)

  • Giles Atkinson

    (Department of Geography and Environment and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom)

  • Matthew J. Kotchen

    (Yale School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA)

Abstract

The United States and United Kingdom have long-standing traditions in the use of environmental benefit-cost analysis (E-BCA). While there are similarities between how E-BCA is utilized, there are significant differences too, many of which mirror ongoing debates and recent developments in the literature on environmental and natural resource economics. We review the use of E-BCA in both countries across three themes: (a) the role of long-term discounting, (b) the estimation and use of carbon valuation, and (c) the estimation and use of the value of a statistical life. In each case, we discuss how academic developments are (and are not) translated into practical use and draw comparative lessons. We find that, in some cases, practical differences in E-BCA can be overstated, although in others these seem more substantive. Advances in the academic frontier also raise the question of when and how to update practical E-BCA, with very different answers across our themes.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph E. Aldy & Giles Atkinson & Matthew J. Kotchen, 2021. "Environmental Benefit-Cost Analysis: A Comparative Analysis Between the United States and the United Kingdom," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 267-288, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:anr:reseco:v:13:y:2021:p:267-288
    DOI: 10.1146/annurev-resource-040821-045913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-040821-045913
    Download Restriction: Full text downloads are only available to subscribers. Visit the abstract page for more information.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1146/annurev-resource-040821-045913?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    benefit-cost analysis; social cost of carbon; social discount rate; value of statistical life; regulatory impact analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:anr:reseco:v:13:y:2021:p:267-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: http://www.annualreviews.org (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.annualreviews.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.