IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/anr/reseco/v11y2019p19-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contemporary Decision Methods for Agricultural, Environmental, and Resource Management and Policy

Author

Listed:
  • David R. Johnson
  • Nathan B. Geldner

Abstract

Traditional top-down methods for resource management ask first what future conditions will be, then identify the best action(s) to take in response to that prediction. Even when acknowledging uncertainty about the future, standard approaches (a) characterize uncertainties probabilistically, then optimize objectives in expectation, and/or (b) develop a small number of representative scenarios to explore variation in outcomes under different policy responses. This leaves planners vulnerable to surprise if future conditions diverge from predictions. In this review, we describe contemporary approaches to decision support that address deep uncertainty about future external forcings, system responses, and stakeholder preferences for different outcomes. Many of these methods are motivated by climate change adaptation, infra-structure planning, or natural resources management, and they provide dramatic improvements in the robustness of management strategies. We outline various methods conceptually and describe how they have been applied in a range of landmark real-world planning studies.

Suggested Citation

  • David R. Johnson & Nathan B. Geldner, 2019. "Contemporary Decision Methods for Agricultural, Environmental, and Resource Management and Policy," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 19-41, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:anr:reseco:v:11:y:2019:p:19-41
    DOI: 10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094020
    Download Restriction: Full text downloads are only available to subscribers. Visit the abstract page for more information.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:anr:reseco:v:11:y:2019:p:19-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: http://www.annualreviews.org (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.annualreviews.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.