This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The Conceptofcorporate Reputation And The Problems Related To It’S Management

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Hakan
Mehmet E. Eryilmaz () (Uludag University)
Abstract

Reputation have become a concept importance of it is emphasized more and more by literatures of the management- organization theory field and other disciplines. The dominant corporate reputation literature seems to create a perception in readers’mind that organizations can manage their reputations at absolute level or so close to it. But in this study, the idea, suggets the limited manageability of organizational reputation, is discussed. According to the study, while organizations try to control their reputations, they encounter some difficulties. Because of that reason, on the contrary of general belief in the literature, management of reputation is so complex process and degree of manageability of it depends on some organizational factors such as politic and financial power of an organization, degree of internationalization and skills of CEO and so on. The development of this type of consciousness is important because in this manner organizations can take concept of reputation more seriously. Also in addition to this main purpose, the another purpose of this study is the clarification of the corporate reputation concept. It generally can be said that formation of the corporate reputation comprises of two phases. In the first phase, stakeholders collect information about an organization via their personal experiences or they benefit from the others’ experiences. They also can provide this information from media. In the second phase, stakeholders intrepret this information and reputation of an organization appears in their minds. In this study, the first, organizational reputation concept will be explained and then difficulties pertaining to manageability of it will be discussed by focusing on these two phases of the process was expressed above briefly.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.anadolu.edu.tr/arastirma/hakemli_dergiler/sosyal_bilimler/pdf/2008-1/2008_01_09.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Article provided by Anadolu University in its journal Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences.

Volume (Year): 8 (2008)
Issue (Month): 1 (June)
Pages: 155-174
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:8:y:2008:i:1:p:155-174

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Yunus Emre Kampusu 26470, Eskişehir
Phone: (90) (222) 335-0580 x 2743
Fax: (90) (222) 320-1304
Email:
Web page: http://www.iibf.anadolu.edu.tr/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Social Sciences Institute) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Social Sciences Institute to update the entry or send us the correct address..

Related research
Keywords: Corporate reputation; organizational image; organizational identity; manageability of corporate reputation.;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting - - Business Administration - - - General

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc data is maintained by each archive holder on its own website. Nothing is held centrally.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-18.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.