IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/and/journl/v6y2006i2p171-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of the Factors Affecting Loyalty to Organization through The Structural Equation Modeling- Example from Private and Public Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Veysel Yilmaz
  • H.Eray Celik
  • Erdogan H.Ekiz

    (Eskisehir Osmangazi University
    Eskisehir Osmangazi University
    Cyprus International University)

Abstract

This study is designed to find out the relationship between public and private bank customers’service quality perceptions and their loyalty to their banks through the use of a research model. To serve this purpose, 250 public and 100 private bank customers are requested to fill out a 37-item questionnaire. Empirical results revealed that while responsiveness and reliability are perceived to be the most influential factors increasing loyalty to the public banks, empathy and reliability are reported in the private banks. Discussion of the results, implications to the bank managers are also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Veysel Yilmaz & H.Eray Celik & Erdogan H.Ekiz, 2006. "Investigation of the Factors Affecting Loyalty to Organization through The Structural Equation Modeling- Example from Private and Public Banks," Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, Anadolu University, vol. 6(2), pages 171-184, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:6:y:2006:i:2:p:171-184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.anadolu.edu.tr/arastirma/hakemli_dergiler/sosyal_bilimler/pdf/2006-2/sos_bil.10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bank Customers; Satisfaction; Loyalty to Bank; Structural Equation Model; Lisrel.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:6:y:2006:i:2:p:171-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Social Sciences Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iianatr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.