IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/and/journl/v5y2005i1p131-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ILearners’Preferences of Communication Tone Used in the Print Materials for Open and Distance Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Cengiz Hakan Aydin

    (Anadolu University)

Abstract

Literature is full of studies about significance of using a friendly conversational tone in open and distance learning materials. However, related literature is based on the studies conducted generally in western cultures. Since research has revealed the influence of culture on human behavior, what the literature on open and distance learning mentions may not be valid in other cultures. From this point of view, this study investigated Turkish distance learners’preferences of communication tone in print materials (textbooks) used in Anadolu University’s distance programs. The study has shown that Turkish distance learners prefer an academic tone rather than friendly conversation in their textbooks.

Suggested Citation

  • Cengiz Hakan Aydin, 2005. "ILearners’Preferences of Communication Tone Used in the Print Materials for Open and Distance Learning," Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, Anadolu University, vol. 5(1), pages 131-148, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:5:y:2005:i:1:p:131-148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.anadolu.edu.tr/arastirma/hakemli_dergiler/sosyal_bilimler/pdf/2005-1/sos_bil.6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Open and Distance Learning; Print Materials; Communication Tone; Cultu- ral Influences.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z00 - Other Special Topics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:5:y:2005:i:1:p:131-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Social Sciences Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iianatr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.