IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ami/journl/v19y2020i3p502-542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reporting on Sustainable Development Goals. A Score-Based Approach with Company-Level Evidence from Central-Eastern Europe Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Elena-Mirela Nichita
  • Elena Nechita
  • Cristina-Lidia Manea
  • Diana Manea
  • Alina-Mihaela Irimescu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

Research Question: Which chemical companies from CEE countries are pioneers in both disclosing SDGs achievements and progressing in fulfilling self-imposed targets? Motivation: Revealing SDGs is unfruitful if it is not supported by relevant indicators to highlight progress against targets (EY, 2017; Schramade, 2017). The strategic importance of the chemical industry, one of the most diversified from all industries, creates sound circumstances for this sector to make known all efforts and contributions towards sustainability engagements (Aga, 2012; Zimara & Eidam, 2015). Idea - Beside financial reporting, currently businesses are encouraged to publish non-financial information to express their awareness about nature and human capital. The chemical industry should consider the SDGs a catalyst for significant business opportunities and a contributor for a better life, across sector and through cooperation with other sectors. Data: In this paper we used a set of panel data extracted from non-financial reports and websites of the 10 largest companies in the chemical industry operating in countries from Central-Eastern Europe: Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia. Our analysis covers the period 2015-2019 and addresses the disclosure and progress on reporting SGDs. Tools - To assess the degree of disclosure regarding SDGs and the advancement alongside companies’ efforts to comply with UN goals, we carried out a textual and content analysis, then we developed a score, with qualitative and quantitative features, to deliberate the disclosure of SDGs information incorporated in reports. Findings - Our discoveries indicate that 63% of the analysed reports did not clearly mention the SDGs that were targeted by companies’ investments. This result noticeably points out that SDGs reporting is presented relatively dissimilar, with reference to structure and extent, among the analysed companies, even though they are part of the same industry. Contribution: We consider this paper may be valuable to scholars in their journey considering, assessing and developing original approaches in regard to researches about non-financial reporting, in general, and SDGs, in particular, nevertheless, to businesses to advance in their accomplishments and reporting on the topic of SDGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena-Mirela Nichita & Elena Nechita & Cristina-Lidia Manea & Diana Manea & Alina-Mihaela Irimescu, 2020. "Reporting on Sustainable Development Goals. A Score-Based Approach with Company-Level Evidence from Central-Eastern Europe Economies," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 19(3), pages 502-542, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:19:y:2020:i:3:p:502-542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://online-cig.ase.ro/RePEc/ami/articles/19_3_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); chemical industry; Central-Eastern Europe (CEE) economies; score-based approach; content analysis; non-financial reporting; disclosure;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:19:y:2020:i:3:p:502-542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina Tartavulea (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.