IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ami/journl/v19y2020i3p409-443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neoliberal Control Devices and Social Discrimination: The Case of Paris Saint-Germain Football Club Fans

Author

Listed:
  • Charles H. Cho

    (Schulich School of Business, York University, Canada)

  • Floriane Janin

    (HEC Paris, France)

  • Christine Cooper

    (University of Edinburgh, UK)

  • Michael Rogerson

    (University of Bath, UK)

Abstract

Research Question: How is neoliberal control exercised over football fans? What is the effect of neoliberal control devices on football fans? Motivation - We draw upon Foucault’s work to explore the various disciplining control devices targeting Paris Saint-Germain Football Club (PSG) fans. At a time of increasing social strife in France, Yann Lorence was killed in a factional dispute between two PSG “ultra” fans groups in 2010. Following this, drastic measures were taken to tighten control over various PSG fan groups. After the acquisition of PSG by Qatar Sports Investments (QSI) in 2011, these control measures were reinforced to the point where they came under the scrutiny of the French commission protecting individual liberties (CNIL)—as one of them resulted in the exclusion of some fans directly from or around the stadium on reportedly “arbitrary” – but actually social – grounds. Idea - We explore the extent to which going one degree further into the market society and implementing a neoliberal rationality can impact social life. More specifically, we examine how social discrimination can be created and encouraged through neoliberal control devices. Data - We use both “netnographic” data and interviews with key actors and stakeholders in the football field. Tools - We examine and analyze the neoliberal control devices implemented by PSG management, in collaboration of the French government, in order to change the socio-demographics of its fan base and ultimately change its image and identity, to consider the operation of control systems from a Foucauldian perspective. Findings - The various methods of control exercised by and around the club significantly blurred the distinction between PSG as a private enterprise and the French state as a legislative/judicial entity. This resulted in fan self-exclusion and self-policing (“control of the self”), and also the enforced removal of a largely working-class portion of the club’s fans. Contribution - We contribute to the study of the articulation of “discipline” and “government” (the two major power techniques in Foucault’s work) and to the management control literature by showing how neoliberal control devices can discriminate against people on sociological grounds, thereby impeding the development of an equal and harmonious social life.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles H. Cho & Floriane Janin & Christine Cooper & Michael Rogerson, 2020. "Neoliberal Control Devices and Social Discrimination: The Case of Paris Saint-Germain Football Club Fans," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 19(3), pages 409-443, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:19:y:2020:i:3:p:409-443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://online-cig.ase.ro/RePEc/ami/articles/19_3_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Foucault; control; neoliberal; discrimination; football; football fans; Paris Saint-Germain;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:19:y:2020:i:3:p:409-443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina Tartavulea (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.