IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ami/journl/v11y2012i4p545-563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intangible Assets: Are These Resources Sufficiently Visible and Properly Controlled?

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana - Sofia DUMITRESCU

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

The current context of market based economy has highlighted the great importance of intangible assets because innovation is considered to be the major factor for economic growth. Whether they are labeled as intangible assets, invisible assets, knowledge capital, core competences, etc., these assets rely on information and knowledge and they add and create value for the company. The article aims to reveal how Romanian companies disclose information about such elements. Referring to the employed research methods, the article is based on a comparative analysis of the information on intangible assets presented in the Annual Reports by a sample of Romanian companies listed at Bucharest Stock Exchange. In order to assess if Romanian companies disclose sufficient information on intangible assets, a standard of disclosures format was firstly conceived and secondly the information disclosed by the sample companies was compared to the standard. Although the capacity for innovation of a company, the intellectual capacity of employees, the internal skills developed within a company (know-how, organization, etc.), the owned patents and technologies, trademarks, the awareness of each brand, the relationship with customers are all identifiable elements that must be taken into account if we want to determine the real value of a company, our study reveals that many Romanian companies listed at Bucharest Stock Exchange do not grant enough importance to disclosing detailed information on the intangible assets in their Annual Reports. This situation may arise because of the lack of awareness or because of the fact that their measurement is most of the time extremely difficult. In this context, based on the conceived standard of disclosures format, our article tries to build a model that will help companies to identify, assess and control their intangible assets. Our proposed model is a suggestion for the presentation of the company’s intangible assets and it can be used not only for internal purposes (intangibles’ management) but also for external purposes (disclosure of non-monetary information that informs investors on the company's resources and potential). The presented model can be considered a guideline which can be easily adapted by companies accordingly to their informational needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana - Sofia DUMITRESCU, 2012. "Intangible Assets: Are These Resources Sufficiently Visible and Properly Controlled?," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 11(4), pages 545-563, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:11:y:2012:i:4:p:545-563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://online-cig.ase.ro/RePEc/ami/articles/11_4_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catalina Gorgan & Vasile Gorgan, 2014. "Study On Disclosure Level Of Companies Listed On The Bucharest Stock Exchange In Accordance With International Financial Reporting Standards: The Case Of Intangible Assets," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 104-115, April.
    2. Bužinskienė Rita, 2017. "Determination of the Value of Intangible Assets in the Companies of Lithuania," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 55-68, December.
    3. Michal Novák, 2018. "The Quality of Disclosure under IAS 38 in Financial Statements of Entities Listed on PSE," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2018(2), pages 31-44.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Intangible assets; intellectual capital; innovation; intangibles management; assessing intangible assets; model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:11:y:2012:i:4:p:545-563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina Tartavulea (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.