IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ama/journl/v13y2014i2p158-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Directions Improve Mechanisms Self-Organization In Public Administration (For Ekspretnymy Votes)

Author

Listed:
  • Chervyakova O.V.

    (KRI NAPA)

Abstract

An expert survey of civil servants in terms of enhancing their understanding of the processes and mechanisms of self-organization in systems of governance in order to apply acquired knowledge and moderate to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of their work. The results of this survey are presented using a gender approach provides opportunities to reveal features of its application in practice of the government. The study showed that many of these features, and they should be taken into consideration, particularly in the preparation of strategies, concepts, software and target documents as well as educational programs for training and retraining of civil servants. Problem setting.The author conducted two surveys of expert civil servants in terms of determining the directions and measures for possible improvement of processes and mechanisms of self-organization in the public administration. It turned out that this was the case as a coincidence, and so quite a substantial deviation peer reviews and cholovykiv women from different perspectives survey. This led to umku summarize and analyze the results from the standpoint of gender mainstreaming. Paper objective is to identify gender-specific expert evaluation of possible improvements of processes and mechanisms of self-organization in the public administration. Paper main body. Each of the two expert surveys conducted in 2013 and 2014 in the Institute for Advanced Studies of the National University of Life and Nature in "Civil Service". Whenever zdiysnyuvadosya survey of public officials in the amount of 100 persons with higher education, among them 50 women and 50 men. The survey was conducted by questionnaire "Improvement of self-organization in the public administration" and "Improving self-management in the state" closed type, containing several answers to each of the questions asked of the possibility provided for their selection by ticking one to five answers, adding responses not covered by the questionnaire. The compilation of questionnaires preceding detailed analysis of national strategies for social development, taking into account factors of self-organizing capacity. In processing the completed questionnaires in addition to the main results of the expert survey - to identify areas and measures to improve potsesiv and mechanisms of self-organization in public administration, was also identified and analyzed a survey of gender assumptions, generalizations below. Vidileno two gender-specific blocks: block matches the actual views of women and men to answer the questions as well as block significant differences in these views. Conclusions of the research.An expert survey of civil servants in terms of enhancing their understanding of the processes and mechanisms of self-organization in systems of governance in order to apply acquired knowledge and moderate to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of their work. The results of this survey are presented using a gender approach provides opportunities to reveal features of its application in practice of the government. The study showed that many of these features, and they should be taken into consideration, particularly in the preparation of strategies, concepts, software and target documents as well as educational programs for training and retraining of civil servants.

Suggested Citation

  • Chervyakova O.V., 2014. "Directions Improve Mechanisms Self-Organization In Public Administration (For Ekspretnymy Votes)," Management, Academy of Municipal Administration, vol. 13(2), pages 158-170, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ama:journl:v:13:y:2014:i:2:p:158-170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://visnyk.amu.edu.ua/repec/archive/2_2014/158-170.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ama:journl:v:13:y:2014:i:2:p:158-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivan Dragan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amakyua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.