IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alu/journl/v1y2009i11p25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ways Of Strenghtening The Statutory Audit Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Ioan Oprean
  • Georgeta AncuÅ£a Åžpan

Abstract

The integrity of the auditor's opinion and the audit process conducting effectiveness hangs on the professional judgment applied on obtaining, processing and interpreting the internal and external information. Documentation is based on all the audit evidence collected through procedures such as: inspection, confirmation, documentation etc. Audit evidence is used to determine whether the financial statements present the economic reality of transactions and if they faithfully reflect the financial position of the company. To achieve a reasonable assurance, the auditor should gather sufficient and high quality audit evidence so that the view expressed in the report of the independent auditor should be based on a credible and relevant background.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioan Oprean & Georgeta AncuÅ£a Åžpan, 2009. "Ways Of Strenghtening The Statutory Audit Efficiency," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(11), pages 1-25.
    • Handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:1:y:2009:i:11:p:25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://oeconomica.uab.ro/upload/lucrari/1120091/25.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamed Zakari & Karim Menacere, 2012. "The challenges of the quality of audit evidence in Libya," African Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 3-24.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:1:y:2009:i:11:p:25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan-Constantin Danuletiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.