IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/akt/journl/v15y2020i2p223-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring of the Scientific Activity Performance of Organizations Performing Research and Development Based on FSMSO – DB AP SO data

Author

Listed:
  • Ekaterina Grishakina

    (Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology; State Autonomous Sociological Research Center)

  • Svetlana Ilieva
  • Nikolay Komarov
  • Ivan Vershinin

    (Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology)

Abstract

Introduction. The article reflects the results of monitoring the scientific activity performance of organizations performing research, development and technological work for civilian use in 2015–2018. The monitoring was carried out in accordance with Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 312 dated April 8, 2009. Monitoring Tools. Comparative analysis is the methodological basis. A systematic approach to studying the results of scientific activities of organizations, a structuralfunctional method, etc. are used in the work. The article reflects the monitoring results for 1,187 organizations whose information has been verified. The results are presented in the format of diagrams and tables containing information on publication activity, scientific human resources, financial support of research and development, and cost effectiveness from the use of the results of intellectual activity. Results. In terms of publication activity, there was a noticeable increase in the average number of publications in journals indexed by Web of Science and Scopus per employee in the field of research and development. However, the average number of publications in journals indexed in the Russian Science Citation Index has declined. Monitoring of the state of science personnel showed a 29 % decrease in the number of researchers relative to the 2015 level. At the same time, the share of auxiliary personnel and other employees in the structure of personnel engaged in research and development increased. In terms of the structure of financial support for scientific activity, two opposing trends were identified: the share of state commission in organizations most often is either dominant or is absent or occupies no more than 20 %. In turn, the share of extrabudgetary sources, which amounted to about a third of total funding in 2015–2017, in 2018 increased to 42 %. The results of monitoring the cost effectiveness of the use of the results of intellectual activity indicate a steady decline in this indicator: in 2018, it decreased more than fourfold compared to 2015. Conclusion. The results of monitoring can be used by federal executive bodies, as well as by all interested parties, to assess the state of the public sector of research and development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekaterina Grishakina & Svetlana Ilieva & Nikolay Komarov & Ivan Vershinin, 2020. "Monitoring of the Scientific Activity Performance of Organizations Performing Research and Development Based on FSMSO – DB AP SO data," Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal, Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL), vol. 15(2), pages 223-250, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:akt:journl:v:15:y:2020:i:2:p:223-250
    DOI: 10.33873/2686-6706.2020.15-2.223-250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://en.sie-journal.ru/assets/uploads/issues/2020/2(36)_05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33873/2686-6706.2020.15-2.223-250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:akt:journl:v:15:y:2020:i:2:p:223-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lubov Pudovkina (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://riep.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.