IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aka/soceco/v40y2018i3p389-400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Argumentation Theory Can Teach Us about Commercials: Strategic Maneuvering and the ‘Tulip Test’

Author

Listed:
  • Hédi Virág Csordás

    (Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary)

  • Gábor Forrai

    (Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary)

Abstract

The paper seeks to show that the theory of strategic maneuvering, the most recent version of the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation, can make vital contribution to understanding how commercials are designed and defended against legal challenges. If commercials can be subjected to argumentation-theoretic analysis, that would also show that the idea that commercials never constitute genuine arguments is mistaken. We will begin by sketching the pragma-dialectical approach and the theory of strategic maneuvering, then we apply the latter to two cases: the argument in a commercial aiming to persuade customers that Dove Intensive Cream moisturizes better than Nivea’s similar product, and the argument given by Dove’s manufacturer, Unilever, during the proceedings conducted by the Hungarian Competition Authority, which is intended to convince the Authority that the commercial is not deceptive.

Suggested Citation

  • Hédi Virág Csordás & Gábor Forrai, 2018. "What Argumentation Theory Can Teach Us about Commercials: Strategic Maneuvering and the ‘Tulip Test’," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 40(3), pages 389-400, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:aka:soceco:v:40:y:2018:i:3:p:389-400
    Note: Special thanks to János Tanács, Gábor Zemplén, István Danka, Réka Markovich and all of the colleagues at the Department of Philosophy and History of Science, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, who helped us with their advice during our research. The research leading to this paper was supported by the grant of the Hungarian National Science Foundation (OTKA K109456).
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.akademiai.com/doi/pdf/10.1556/204.2018.40.3.6
    Download Restriction: subscription
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aka:soceco:v:40:y:2018:i:3:p:389-400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kriston, Orsolya (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://akademiai.hu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.