IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aka/soceco/v24y2002i1p161-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EU and EMU Accession - Whether and How the Decisions Differ?

Author

Listed:
  • Hajna Istvánffy Lőrinc

    (Europe Department, Budapest University of Economic Sciences and Public Administration H-1093 Budapest, Fővám tér 8, Hungary)

Abstract

The author presents the criretia of and prospects for the EU candidate countries joining the European Monetary Union. Enlargement taken as a decided question, she considers EMU accession the “second gate” for candidates. The status of Denmark and the UK are seen as exceptions, the way of which new members may not follow - thus their sooner or later joining the EMU is an obligatory task. The candidates have to meet the convergence criteria, regarding which stress is put on the difference of nominal and real convergence. So, during the at least two years preparing period between EU and EMU accession, strictly supervised “convergence programmes” would be conducted. Financial and economic liberalisation criteria of accession are also expressed. The author presents the main points of the past three stages of introducing EMU, according to which the question for new members of when to join the EMU can be more precisely answered. She focuses on the balance of interests of members and candidates, the trap of early accession, the case of asymmetric, country-specific shocks and also on the problem of giving up national exchange-rate policies. She concludes for new members that the consideration of the ability of fulfilling the above criteria is indispensable for determining a realistic plan of joining the EMU.

Suggested Citation

  • Hajna Istvánffy Lőrinc, 2002. "EU and EMU Accession - Whether and How the Decisions Differ?," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 24(1), pages 161-172, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:aka:soceco:v:24:y:2002:i:1:p:161-172
    Note: This is an edited version of the Author’s lecture held at the conference of the Europe Centre of the Budapest University of Economic Sciences and Public Administration in February 2001.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://akademiai.com/content/gq78555k1m600187/fulltext.pdf?page=1
    Download Restriction: subscription
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aka:soceco:v:24:y:2002:i:1:p:161-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kriston, Orsolya (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://akademiai.hu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.