IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aka/aoecon/v69y2019i2p161-189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Women´s Job Satisfaction Higher than Men´s? Self-Selection, Expectations or Utility Function

Author

Listed:
  • Nuria Sánchez-Sánchez

    (Department of Economics, University of Cantabria, Spain)

  • Adolfo C. Fernandez Puente

    (Department of Economics, University of Cantabria, Spain)

Abstract

This paper examines the paradox between high relative levels of job satisfaction and the characteristics of women’s jobs compared to men´s in Spain. Three hypothesis are considered: i) the existence of a selection bias when participating in the labour market; ii) of the presence of adaptive job satisfaction; and iii) the existence of differences related to preferences of different nature to strictly labour issues. The study shows that, although having lower working conditions, women are more likely to be satisfied at work than men are. This paradox persists regardless of the inclusion of a great range of variables of different nature (objective and subjective), the age group and educational level under consideration. The Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition suggests that women´s preferences are actually influencing the differences in job satisfaction. However, it is not demonstrated that these differences disappear as age decreases or educational level increases. The probable existence of a “glass ceiling” that prevents women from having access to posts of greater responsibility and higher wages could cause that women who actually reach them are more satisfied than their male colleagues. As the labour market and society become more equal, this paradox might dilute.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuria Sánchez-Sánchez & Adolfo C. Fernandez Puente, 2019. "Is Women´s Job Satisfaction Higher than Men´s? Self-Selection, Expectations or Utility Function," Acta Oeconomica, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 69(2), pages 161-189, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:aka:aoecon:v:69:y:2019:i:2:p:161-189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.akademiai.com/doi/pdf/10.1556/032.2019.69.2.2
    Download Restriction: subscription
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    satisfaction; self-selection; expectations; working conditions; personal development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aka:aoecon:v:69:y:2019:i:2:p:161-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kriston, Orsolya (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://akademiai.hu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.