IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajo/ijoest/v4y2021i1p17-26id62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing Descriptive Writing among Chinese Undergraduates According to Gender

Author

Listed:
  • Qian CHEN
  • Subadrah Madhawa Nair

Abstract

The aim of the study is to assess the Chinese undergraduate students’ EFL descriptive writing ability according to gender and to explore four EFL lecturers’ views on how to help students enhance their EFL descriptive writing. This study employed descriptive research design using the QUAN-qual model. A descriptive writing test was used as an instrument and the essays of the students were marked by a lecturer. Purposive sampling was used to select samples which consists of 400 Chinese undergraduate students (200 males and 200 females) from Hunan City University in Hunan Province, China. Before the actual study, the researcher carried out a pilot test to investigate the reliability and validity of the instrument (descriptive writing test). The results obtained from the quantitative data showed that female students outperformed male students in their overall writing as well as each component of the writing. In relation to students’ writing level, the lecturers emphasized that it is very crucial to utilize the Process Approach in class to enhance students’ vocabulary and grammar foundation. In addition, students are required to practice writing more frequently which can arouse their enthusiasm in learning English.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian CHEN & Subadrah Madhawa Nair, 2021. "Analyzing Descriptive Writing among Chinese Undergraduates According to Gender," International Journal of Educational Studies, Academia Publishing Group, vol. 4(1), pages 17-26.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajo:ijoest:v:4:y:2021:i:1:p:17-26:id:62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://academiainsight.com/index.php/ijes/article/view/62/38
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajo:ijoest:v:4:y:2021:i:1:p:17-26:id:62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucía Aguado (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academiainsight.com/index.php/ijes/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.