IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajo/ijoest/v2y2019i2p65-76id106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the Correlation between Self-Efficacy Beliefs and English Language Attainments among Thai University Students

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Rudd

Abstract

This study examined the predictive value of Bandura’s 100 point self-efficacy scales among 208 third year university students (female; n = 108, male; n = 90) from three separate faculties; veterinary medicine (n = 60), business administration (n = 77) and engineering (n = 71) at a private institute of technology located on the outskirts of Bangkok. The central research question of this paper was to ascertain the extent to which one’s self-efficacy beliefs in English language attainments correspond with respective performance outcomes. Respondents were required to indicate their levels of self-efficacy in English as a general subject, as well as in domain specific matters relative to speaking proficiency, mid-term tests and final examinations. The results showed that the predictive value of subject related measures of self-efficacy across the sample population proved to be highly accurate, as the means of both sets of results were not significantly different (S.E: 68.12% vs. English: 66.28%; p <0.05), and were closely correlated (r = 0.692).The results from the domain specific scales, however, were less consistent. While there was no significant difference between declarations of self-efficacy and grade outcomes in both mid-term tests and final examinations (mid-term:62.59% vs. 64.33%; final: 63.22% vs.64.24%; p <0.05), and, both variables were also closely correlated (mid-term, r = 0.7018; final, r = 0.686); personal efficacy judgments for speaking proficiency were significantly inferior to respective attainments (58.46 vs. 68.25; p <0.05); resulting in a weaker correlation (r = 0.5248).

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Rudd, 2019. "Measuring the Correlation between Self-Efficacy Beliefs and English Language Attainments among Thai University Students," International Journal of Educational Studies, Academia Publishing Group, vol. 2(2), pages 65-76.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajo:ijoest:v:2:y:2019:i:2:p:65-76:id:106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://academiainsight.com/index.php/ijes/article/view/106/65
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajo:ijoest:v:2:y:2019:i:2:p:65-76:id:106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucía Aguado (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academiainsight.com/index.php/ijes/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.