IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aio/fpvfcf/v1y2023i25p24-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fintech Trends and Banking Digitalisation. Insights from a Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia GHERÈšESCU

    (University of Craiova)

  • Alina Georgiana MANTA

    (University of Craiova)

Abstract

This study presents a bibliometric analysis, the aim of which is to synthesize bibliometric analysis in the fintech field in order to provide a detailed understanding of trends, developments and influence of research and publications in this continuously growing field. Keyword analysis of fintech articles and publications can reveal the main research themes and subfields. By analysing the number of citations and the impact of papers, bibliometric research can help to assess the impact and recognition of researchers and institutions in the fintech community. The sample includes 424 articles, and these results are associated with the term "fintech", with no additional restrictions. The evolution of the number of publications and citations over time is detailed in the analysis below. The term "fintech" started to be significantly more used in Web of Science articles from 2020 onwards. The overall trend is upwards, with 2022 recording the highest number of publications and citations. Therefore, the number of papers is significant and such an analysis gives us the possibility to rank and identify the most cited authors as well as the most prestigious research centres in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia GHERÈšESCU & Alina Georgiana MANTA, 2023. "Fintech Trends and Banking Digitalisation. Insights from a Bibliometric Analysis," Finante - provocarile viitorului (Finance - Challenges of the Future), University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(25), pages 24-36, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:aio:fpvfcf:v:1:y:2023:i:25:p:24-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://feaa.ucv.ro/finance/fisiere/revista/2274461204.%20Ghertescu_Manta.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald Vatananan-Thesenvitz & Amaury-Alexandre Schaller & Randall Shannon, 2019. "A Bibliometric Review of the Knowledge Base for Innovation in Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-22, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudiu Cicea & Carmen Țurlea & Corina Marinescu & Nicolae Pintilie, 2022. "Organizational Culture: A Concept Captive between Determinants and Its Own Power of Influence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    2. María Bastida & Alberto Vaquero García & Miguel Á. Vázquez Taín, 2021. "A New Life for Forest Resources: The Commons as a Driver for Economic Sustainable Development—A Case Study from Galicia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Elisa Baraibar-Diez & Manuel Luna & María D. Odriozola & Ignacio Llorente, 2020. "Mapping Social Impact: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Emilio Abad-Segura & Ana Batlles-delaFuente & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña, 2021. "Implications for Sustainability of the Joint Application of Bioeconomy and Circular Economy: A Worldwide Trend Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Arash Hajikhani & Arho Suominen, 2022. "Mapping the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in science, technology and innovation: application of machine learning in SDG-oriented artefact detection," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6661-6693, November.
    6. Philip Hallinger, 2020. "Analyzing the intellectual structure of the Knowledge base on managing for sustainability, 1982–2019: A meta‐analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1493-1506, September.
    7. Maria Bastida & Alberto Vaquero García & Maite Cancelo Márquez & Ana Olveira Blanco, 2020. "Fostering the Sustainable Development Goals from an Ecosystem Conducive to the SE: The Galician’s Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Philip Hallinger, 2021. "A Meta-Synthesis of Bibliometric Reviews of Research on Managing for Sustainability, 1982–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Inês Girão & Eduardo Gomes & Paulo Pereira & Jorge Rocha, 2023. "Trends in High Nature Value Farmland and Ecosystem Services Valuation: A Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-28, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aio:fpvfcf:v:1:y:2023:i:25:p:24-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alina Manta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fecraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.