IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/uersfr/266090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lettuce Provides Indication of Pesticide Use and Residues

Author

Listed:
  • Vandeman, Ann
  • Shank, David
  • Chandran, Ram
  • Vasavada, Utpal

Abstract

Pesticides make an important contribution to high U.S. farm productivity and a lowcost, plentiful food supply. Some scientific evidence shows that pesticide residues are not a serious risk to the safety of the food supply. Yet there are widespread concerns based on contrary evidence about pesticide use and toxicity to humans, chronic health effects, food safety, water pollution, and threats to wildlife. Consumers frequently rank pesticide residues on food as the number one food safety risk. These concerns, together with pressures to regulate and restrict agrichemical use in U.S. agriculture, are stimulating the search for alternative farming methods. Improved pesticide-application methods and techniques such as the close monitoring of pest populations, crop rotation, and developing a plant's genetic resistance to specific pests offer the possibility of limiting pesticide use while preserving the productivity and economic viability of U.S. farms. USDA's Pesticide Data Program (see box) gathers information on pesticide residues remaining on produce and on growers' use of pesticides. These data offer an opportunity to study the relationships between pesticide use on the farm and the residues found on produce. They will also help in examining the evolution of production practices in agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Vandeman, Ann & Shank, David & Chandran, Ram & Vasavada, Utpal, 1992. "Lettuce Provides Indication of Pesticide Use and Residues," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 15(3), October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersfr:266090
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.266090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266090/files/FoodReview-091.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266090/files/FoodReview-091.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.266090?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersfr:266090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.